|
|
Regulating Complementray therapiesRegulating Complementary medicine
A
recent debate in the house of commons was around the regulation of
complementary medicine. It was clarified during the debate that the
purpose of considering regulation was purely as a protection for the
public and to be applied to therapies that were considered a threat to
the patients when in the wrong hands.
The therapies under
consideration were acupuncture and herbal medicine (and especially
chinese herbal medicine) both of which have the potential to cause harm
when in the wrong hands.
We agree that these and all therapies
must be carried out by experienced and properly trained therapist but
also would like to add that training and legislation hasn't proved that
effective so for in allopathic medicine circles.
In the U.S.,
medical errors are estimated to result in 44,000 to 98,000 unnecessary
deaths and 1,000,000 excess injuries each year, the equivalent of
three jumbo-jet crashes every 2 days'.
That's more than die from motor vehicle accidents, breast cancer, or
AIDS—three causes that receive far more public attention.
So
in effect what is being acknowledged is that most complementary
therapies are safe. The fact that there is a yet no way (except tried
and tested) to show how they scientifically work is for the recipient
to decide. We know there are chancers out there who try to take
advantage of people looking for solutions but so there are in the
allopathic field.
But at least you now know that complementary medicine on the whole will not kill you.
The debate goes on... |
Join us now
Never miss out again!
Join our mailing list
email
|